Public concerns over the county’s new Unified Development Ordinance
and Official Zoning Map has resulted in at least another month being
added to the already 19-month-long rewriting process for the UDO.
More than 75 people, most from the Elgin community, attended the UDO
public hearing Tuesday night to voice their concerns about the
ordinance’s Environmental Hazardous Overlay District, which they fear
will restrict their land use. Many addressed the Planning Commission
during the citizens’ comments portion in the four-hour meeting.
Members of St. Luke United Methodist Church and the surrounding
community had heard rumors that if their church burned down they would
not be allowed to rebuild it in the same location. County officials
assured them that was not the case.
“There is a genuine concern about the establishment of the
rail-pipeline overlay affecting their property values and their ability
to use their property as they choose,” said County Council Chair Bob
Bundy.
He said most residents had questions about property values, insurance costs, and limits on rebuilding if disaster strikes.
“These are all legitimate questions, and I hope some were answered the other night,” Bundy said.
According to the proposed UDO, the Hazardous Pipeline/Rail Overlay is
“established to protect the general public from unnecessary risk,
promote public health, safety and welfare associated with transmission
pipelines and rail corridors by providing a margin of restricted use
within close proximity to both hazardous pipelines and rail.”
The Hazardous Pipeline/Rail Overlay has a 550-foot zone from the center
of the railroad tracks prohibiting “high-consequence land uses.” Those
are locations where a train derailment or pipe leak could have the most
significant adverse consequences. such as near a church, school or
nursing home.
St. Luke Methodist sits within the zone, while the parsonage is just beyond the zone, according to St. Luke pastor Bill McCown.
“The unintended consequences are my greatest concerns,” said McCown. “The change in zoning may affect insurance rates.”
McCown’s worries include the possible restrictions on St. Luke with
regards to future growth, the recreation field and a structure that may
be used for a future Boy Scout hut or day-care center.
Elgin resident Rudy Carter, owner of Do It Printing, said his main
concern is the economic impact on the Elgin community. He said he feels
property values will decrease as a result of the overlay district.
“I told them I thought it was total zoning overkill and that I didn’t
see any reason for the overlay to be put into place and that it would
negatively impact property values all along that line. It’s not just
Elgin, but it is also Pleasant Hill, Heath Springs and Kershaw.”
The railroad runs parallel to U.S. 521 all the way to Kershaw.
Carter said he got conflicting answers from several members of the
planning commission about the overlay-district zoning’s effects on
property.
“It makes me a little leery of what is going on,” he said.
Overall, Carter said he felt the planning department listened to the
citizens and feels they will take their concerns into consideration.
Planning Director Penelope Karagounis said the planning commission will
hold its next public hearing at 6:30 p.m. Oct. 3. In the interim, the
commission will be working on possible changes to the proposed UDO.
“We are taking a look at the revisions from the workshop held Monday
night with county council, state and county agencies’ comments and the
public hearing comments,” said Karagounis. “We are regrouping and we
will make some revisions.”
Eight percent of the comments and concerns were about the pipeline and rail overlay, Karagounis said.
“The purpose of the overlay districts is to limit the number of people
who could be in harm’s way if an event happens,” said Patrick Helms of
the county emergency management office.
“In the past, there have never been policies in the county that said
you can’t build a structure because of safety reasons,” Helms said.
Emergency management’s concerns focus on hazards in pipeline and rail
corridors that might place people in hospitals, churches, schools and
nursing homes within close proximity to hazards. In particular the
concern focuses on high-density populations that cannot evacuate
themselves.
The pipeline/rail overlay does not prevent single-family homes,
businesses or any routine uses of land, but it would prevent places of
assembly, Helms said.
Helms addressed the concerns regarding the recreation field at St. Luke
and he said the overlay places no restrictions on the ball field.
Many cities build developments around pipelines and use the land for green spaces and parks, Helms said.
There were some misunderstandings about whether a home or church could
be rebuilt if it burned down, but they absolutely can, Helms said.
“It’s never been our intention to cause harm to anyone or any
property,” Helms said. “Emergency management’s intention is to protect
the public and especially those who can’t protect themselves.
“We are being proactive to prevent possible tragedy,” Helms said.
Past disasters such as the 2013 explosion of the fertilizer plant in
West, Texas, have served as a lesson for emergency management officials.
The fertilizer plant was near a school, a nursing home and an apartment
building, which created havoc for emergency personnel.
Prior to the UDO rewrite, Lancaster County had no zoning laws
preventing building structures near hazardous pipelines or railroads.
The new UDO has certain zones within a certain number of feet from the
center of the pipeline or railroad tracks which restrict new habitable
structures, another that restricts new structures with vulnerable
populations, and a third that requires notification to the rail or
pipeline about these new structures, Bundy said.
He said the county has tried not to change the land-use options of
property owners through the establishment of the new zoning classes. The
new overlays are likely the main cause for confusion, Bundy said.
“The concerns will be considered and the document refined to reflect some of the concerns,” Bundy said.
After, the planning commission’s special meeting and public hearing
Oct. 3, the UDO will be submitted to the Lancaster County Council for
approval.
Follow Reporter Mandy Catoe on Twitter @MandyCatoeTLN or contact her at (803) 283-1152
No comments:
Post a Comment